Skip Navigation

A longtime leader in healthcare improvement, we’re developing new ways to revolutionize the industry.

We deliver transformative solutions that power real results. See how we can help.

Optimizing Supply Chain
Integrating Pharmacy
Maximizing Value-Based Care
Awards and Recognition

Transforming healthcare is more than our objective, it’s in our DNA. We’re dedicated to ensuring better health is just the beginning.

Sustainability

Guided by our values, our employees work every day to make meaningful differences in healthcare. At the core of what we do is our most valuable resource - our people. Learn more about us.

Leadership
Board of Directors
Speakers Bureau

Premier is more than a GPO. Combining robust analytics with consulting and advocacy, we’re changing the healthcare landscape for the better.

Collective purchasing power lowers costs across your organization.

Intelligence plus unparalleled analytics equals data-driven solutions.

It’s only impossible until it’s not. Premier and our team of experts are transforming care delivery.

Work with Premier members to lower costs, improve quality and safety and succeed in value-based care.

A voice for better healthcare policy is a voice for you.

Working closely with our members, we’re developing products and services to solve your most complex challenges.

Lower costs, greater efficiencies and a healthier bottom line.

Proven practices that result in better outcomes.

Intersecting specialty drugs with better management and data-driven best practices.

Controlling your future with integrated care delivery practices.

More savings and ROI is a win-win.

Data diving to deliver insights you can act on.

Supporting healthcare transformation through the generation of real-world evidence.

Working closely with our members, we're developing products and services to solve your most complex challenges.

Discover what leading healthcare providers are achieving through Premier membership.

Stay informed with our white papers, webinars and e-books.

Browse our blog for a taste of what’s new and what’s next in healthcare.

Premier’s perspectives have been solicited by nationally renowned publications. Read on.

Read Premier’s latest announcements.

Catch our policy statements and perspectives on the latest in DC.

Compelling stories from the front lines of America’s health systems.

The proactive, predictive and behind-the-scenes insights you need to stay ahead in healthcare delivered monthly to your inbox.

MIPS Reporting 101

In the midst of all the complicated reporting mechanisms in healthcare, the Quality Payment Program gave us the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). And for good reason. MIPS combines the Physician Quality Reporting System, Value Modifier Program and Electronic Health Record Incentive Program into a single reporting program.

MIPS presents a significant opportunity to turn regulatory risk into true financial reward. However, for those choosing MIPS, determining whether to report at the Individual or Group level in the 2017 measurement period can be a head scratcher.

Individual vs Group

  • Individual: report MIPS measures to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at the “Individual” Tax ID Number (TIN) or National Provider Identifier (NPI) level. In which, each TIN could have as little as a single NPI (i.e. a single provider billing under that TIN).
  • Group: report along with other Providers (NPI’s) under a common TIN.

Pros, cons and implications

While the Individual option is the simplest and most obvious option there are a few things to consider.

  • Low volume and revenue exclusions may apply more quickly (less than 100 beneficiaries or $30,000 in part B claims).
  • It is especially important to note (as illustrated below), that reporting via claims is only able to be done if the Individual option is selected.

Alternatively, the Group option can provide a lot more flexibility and ability to pool together higher and lower performing eligible clinicians (ECs). But, there are a few things to consider here also.

  • As mentioned, if there are EC’s that are not performing as well, it can help mitigate the impact of those lower scoring ECs by balancing out the scores.
  • Also, if there are specialties that exist under a TIN and that do not have metrics that align very well or if some EC’s within the TIN are still struggling under the ACI (formerly Meaningful Use) category, Group reporting can again help mitigate once the scores are aggregated.

The diagram below illustrates a decision tree for each reporting option. Carefully considering the pros/cons of each is very important.

MIPS Graph

If you’re struggling with whether to report at the Individual or Group level, or aren’t sure if you’re required to report for MIPS in 2017, click here for more information.

Login Register Change Registration